Skip to content

England

Food Hygiene Ratings in WR13

The WR13 postcode district has 65 food businesses with a published Food Standards Agency hygiene rating, inspected by Malvern Hills. Around 45% are rated 5 (Very Good), and the average rating here is 4.43 out of 5. Browse every rating below.

65food businesses
45%rated 5 (Very Good)
0%rated 0 (Urgent)
4.43average rating (FHRS)

Rating distribution for WR13

Very Good29
Good11
Generally Satisfactory6
Improvement Necessary0
Major Improvement Necessary1
Urgent Improvement Necessary0

Food businesses in WR13

Showing 51–65 of 65 businesses, best rated first.

BusinessTypeLocationRatingInspected
Leigh And Bransford Primary SchoolSchool/college/universityWorcestershireAwaiting Inspection.
Madresfield Working Mens ClubPub/bar/nightclubWorcestershireExempt.
Swallowfields RetreatRetailers - otherCastlemortonExempt.
Riverside Caravan ParkPub/bar/nightclubWorcestershireExempt.
Exploring Taste At Birtsmorton CourtRetailers - otherWorcestershireExempt.
Malt HouseHotel/bed & breakfast/guest houseEvendine LaneAwaiting Inspection.
Birtsmorton CourtOther catering premisesWorcestershireExempt.
Welland Primary SchoolSchool/college/universityMalvernExempt.
Helen Owen EventsMobile catererWorcestershireExempt.
Castlemorton Parish HallOther catering premisesCastlemortonExempt.
Guarlford Village HallOther catering premisesMalvern WorcestershireExempt.
Welland Parish HallOther catering premisesMalvern WorcestershireExempt.
Leigh & Bransford Memorial HallOther catering premisesMalvern WorcestershireExempt.
Madresfield CE Primary SchoolSchool/college/universityWorcestershireAwaiting Inspection.
WEB AmusementsMobile catererMalvernExempt.

Explore the wider area

The WR13 district falls mainly within Malvern Hills, the local authority responsible for food hygiene inspections here.

Hygiene ratings for WR13 are © Food Standards Agency / Crown copyright, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. HygieneCheck is an independent site and is not affiliated with the FSA. Spotted something wrong?